MTG Traumatic Prank | Alchemy: New Capenna | Art by Brian Valeza
14, Sep, 26

Sudden MTG Arena Format Erasure Is a Massive Step Backward

Share

Last week, following what seemed to be an early leak, Wizards revealed that the Alchemy format is being shut down. On February 2nd, 2027, the format’s queues are being removed from the platform, with reworked cards being reverted beforehand. While we are getting one last hurrah in Alchemy: Reality Fracture, this almost feels more like an insult than a celebration.

As an Alchemy player, I’ve naturally been rather upset about this decision ever since Wizards announced it. While it seems that many more players are vocally celebrating, this change is a huge blow to MTG Arena. Beyond this, it’s concerningly easy to pick holes in Wizards of the Coast’s explanation, too.

Suspect Reasonings for Removal

MTG Unexplained Disappearance | Guilds of Ravnica | Art by Izzy
MTG Unexplained Disappearance | Guilds of Ravnica | Art by Izzy

When explaining why Alchemy was being retired early next year, Wizards highlighted that, technically, it’s no longer needed. Since MTG Arena has more formats, more cards, and more churn than ever before, the format’s original core is redundant. Technically, all of these points are true; however, it does feel like Wizards is cherry-picking their point somewhat.

Rather than becoming irrelevant when Universes Beyond hit Standard and the number of sets increased, Alchemy has evolved. Thanks to having a two-year rotation cycle, the format still felt fresh and interesting, with its own unique metagame. On top of this, rebalancing, not to mention the dedicated cards, made the format feel genuinely unique and distinct from even current Standard.

With this in mind, the core reason that Alchemy was canned due to lacking a role feels rather shallow. As if this wasn’t enough, the most recent data showed that Alchemy had a pretty substantial player base. Unfortunately, Alchemy was excluded from the 2026 play rate breakdown, but in 2025, it was more popular than both Timeless and Explorer.

Looking at the 2026 graph, even after Explorer became Pioneer, there wasn’t a steep uptick in play. The only format that has popped up recently is Competitive Brawl, but that’s taken its chunk largely out of regular Brawl. Even without all the numbers, this really makes it seem like Wizards is killing off a fairly popular MTG format.

That being said, while Alchemy definitely had its fans and players, it’s hard to deny this format had problems. Not only were there frequent complaints about cards and names being stolen, but many Alchemy MTG cards were borderline broken. Even then, however, Alchemy had one trick up its sleeve that Wizards has mismanaged into the ground.

The Reality of Rebalancing

MTG Anchor to Reality | Kamigawa: Neon Dynasty | Art by Alix Branwyn
MTG Anchor to Reality | Kamigawa: Neon Dynasty | Art by Alix Branwyn

In theory, rebalancing MTG cards could have been the one feature that made Alchemy always stand out and worth playing. In reality, however, rebalances were incredibly few and far between, and had a huge interconnectedness problem. Since any rebalance in Alchemy also affected Brawl, Historic, and Timeless, Wizards couldn’t perfectly curate any one format.

Due to this, when Wizards announced that all rebalances would be reverted on September 22nd, many players quickly celebrated. As much as some of the nerfs have been legitimately annoying, many buffs have been genuinely useful. The buff to Symmetry Sage, for instance, made Wizards more viable in Historic, as did the buffs to various Ninjas.

Even if it makes things slightly less confusing, positive rebalances being reverted feels like a step backwards. It’s not even like Historic and Timeless will just be purely paper cards now, either, since the mechanically unique Alchemy MTG cards are staying around. Since many of these are still very powerful, some players are likely to keep requesting Alchemy-free formats, too.

Since creating new Alchemy-free versions of Brawl, Historic, and Timeless would split the player base, this happening feels exceptionally unlikely. On top of that, three extra unique formats would require a ton of extra rebalancing work. If anything, this is the real problem that’s likely why Alchemy got scrapped.

The Real Reason

MTG Abandon Reason | Eldritch Moon | Art by Josh Hass
MTG Abandon Reason | Eldritch Moon | Art by Josh Hass

Ultimately, while Wizards doesn’t talk about it in their article, Alchemy wasn’t a free format. Typically, MTG formats can be relatively hands-off, with only a ban needed here and there to keep things fair. Even formats with dedicated panels, like Pauper, don’t need that much maintenance in the grand scheme of MTG.

In comparison, not only did Alchemy require constant deep analysis for potential rebalances, but it got new cards, too. Even with only around 90 new cards per year, at the current rate, that’s still a lot of development resources. After all, not only do new cards need to be designed and playtested, but they need art and story significance, too.

While spending these resources made sense at Alchemy’s inception, the MTG Arena team is dealing with a lot right now. With seven Standard-legal sets joining the client this year, the Arena team has more on their plate than ever before. Having an extra 90 Alchemy cards on top of this was likely just too much, especially alongside all the trimmings.

Unfortunately, while Alchemy definitely had its fans and a surprisingly robust player base, it clearly didn’t do enough to justify that added cost. As such, with Wizards of the Coast being a business at the end of the day, it’s now dead. In theory, this makes sense, but it does feel like Alchemy has been fighting with one hand behind its back for years.

What Could Have Been

MTG Priest of Possibility | Alchemy: Dominaria | Art by Nicholas Elias
MTG Priest of Possibility | Alchemy: Dominaria | Art by Nicholas Elias

While it’s a bit late to do anything about it now, Wizards could have made Alchemy truly a great MTG format. To do that, I think Wizards would have had to cut it loose and make it independent of Brawl, Historic, and Timeless. This would also open the door for a new format, something like Alchemy Eternal, that’d include sets from Alchemy: Innistrad, till now.

At the very least, decoupling Alchemy from everything else would appease all of those die-hard Alchemy haters who are currently celebrating its death. Beyond that, Wizards could rebalance in peace, without worrying about affecting other formats. Ideally, this would also open the door for faster rebalances, giving the format a more unique and balanced feel.

Admittedly, if Wizards were doing this, there’d need to be some compensation for rebalances, even with partial wildcards. This would help offset the punishment of having your best deck nerfed till it’s no longer competitive. If Wizards could figure this out, however, then it could maintain an even healthier player base.

Sadly, while Alchemy could shine with more support, or even dramatic changes like removing Universes Beyond, there’s no guarantee of success. Considering these proposals would all cost additional development resources too; success is absolutely needed to justify the cost. This may be why Alchemy ended up scrapped, as conversations about saving the format may have hit this roadblock.

Filling the Void

MTG Chorale of the Void | Edge of Eternities | Art by Alix Branwyn
MTG Chorale of the Void | Edge of Eternities | Art by Alix Branwyn

Regardless of what Alchemy could have been, the format will officially die on February 2nd, 2027. Even this feels especially fast, as it could have lasted another rotation cycle, at least, without new cards. Sadly, that won’t happen, so we’ll be left without a two-year rotation format on MTG Arena, which is a real shame.

Now that Standard has enough cards to keep it moving, we’re running into the opposite problem, as there’s too much to keep up with. In theory, community-driven formats like Planar Standard do solve this problem, but all of those have their own quirks and features. Planar Standard, for instance, has no Universes Beyond cards, which makes it becoming a sanctioned format seem unlikely.

At the end of the day, since Wizards only peeled back the curtain so much, it’s unclear what, if anything, is being planned. Given the reasons they provided for Alchemy’s demise, it feels like nothing will replace it, but that’s not guaranteed. For now, we’ll have to wait and see what happens, but there are potential positives ahead.

If nothing else, with Alchemy dead, the MTG Arena team can, hopefully, dedicate more resources toward Commander. With four-player multiplayer still in the works, ideally we might even end up getting entire precons at some point. Whether or not this will happen, however, remains to be seen.

Stick with us here at mtgrocks.com: the best site for Magic: The Gathering coverage. Be sure to check out our deckbuilder for your next big brew, and our MTG Rocks Podcast!

BROWSE